Page 63 - Annual Report 2021 EN
P. 63
/ 63 T ABLE OF C ONTENT S
Enforcement Actions in 2021
Disciplinary action against Nigel Perera, Disciplinary action against Prabha QFC Court judgments Customer Protection: The Customer
former CEO of International Financial James, Senior Manager of First Dispute Resolution Scheme
The QFCRA was party to one (1) proceeding in the Qatar
Services (Qatar) LLC (currently known Abu Dhabi Bank PJSC (FAB)
International Court in 2021: An internal complaints-handling framework is a
as Prime Financial Solutions LLC)
The QFCRA took disciplinary action against • Qatar Financial Centre Regulatory Authority v Horizon requirement for authorised firms in the QFC. Where
In April 2021, the QFCRA took disciplinary action Mrs Prabha James, the Senior Manager of FAB, for Crescent Wealth LLC [2021] customer complaints are not satisfactorily resolved by a
against the former CEO of International Financial serious misconduct as an approved individual, and QIC (A)5 (on appeal from [2020] QIC (F)12) firm’s internal framework, customers can seek redress
Services (Qatar) LLC (currently known as Prime imposed a financial penalty of USD $100,000, a Case No. CTAD0002/2020 (20 June 2021). through an external independent adjudication process,
Financial Solutions LLC), Mr Nigel Perera, for failing five-year prohibition from carrying out any function the Customer Dispute Resolution Scheme (CDRS). The
to act with due skill, care and diligence in relation for an authorised firm within the QFC and withdrawal CDRS has been in operation since 2014 and has resulted
to his oversight of the firm’s compliance with the of her approval as a Senior Manager. QFC Regulatory Tribunal decisions in a number of successful outcomes for customers.
QFCRA’s requirements as required by the Individuals
• Nigel Thomas Howard Perera v Qatar Financial
(Assessment, Training and Competency) Rules 2014. Mrs James provided incorrect information to the
Centre Regulatory Authority [2021]
QFCRA as part of the FAB investigation, failed to
QIC (RT) 6 (30 December 2021); and
Mr Perera appealed the QFCRA’s decision to impose attend interviews in respect of her own investigation
a financial penalty of QAR 273,000 and a three-year and failed to ensure that FAB’s business operations
• Nazim Omara v Qatar Financial Centre
prohibition from carrying out a controlled function in the QFC complied with QFC Court orders. Mrs
Regulatory Authority [2021] QIC (RT)4
for a QFC authorised firm, and the QFC Regulatory James’s contraventions were (a) obstructing the
Case 2 of 2011 (12 October 2021).
Tribunal upheld the three-year prohibition and the QFCRA in the exercise of its functions, (b) failing
financial penalty for one of the two contraventions to act with due skill, care and diligence in relation
(QAR 136,500) imposed by the QFCRA. to her oversight of FAB’s compliance with the
QFCRA’s requirements, and (c) failing to deal with
the QFCRA in an open and co-operative manner.