Page 31 - Annual Report 2019
P. 31
28 ANNUAL REPORT 2019 SUPERVISION AND AUTHORISATION
Supervision and Authorisation
The Supervision and Authorisation division consists of six framework, with firms self-assessing their capabilities. Insurers also have a more indirect way of covering
departments: Authorisation, Supervision (comprising the Bank The analysis of firms’ responses indicated a number of cyberattacks for policyholders, known as “non-
Supervision, Insurance Supervision and Investment Management common themes. The Regulatory Authority’s assessment affirmative cyber risk” or “silent coverage”. In this
Supervision departments), Anti-Money Laundering/Combatting the of the banking, insurance and investment management instance, policies associated with cyber risk are not
Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT), and Macroprudential Analysis. sectors in Qatar provided positive results with firms allocating explicitly included in insurance policies, yet clients
adequate funds and resources to defend against cyberattacks. could place an insurance claim on issues caused directly
In 2019, the division focused on thematic reviews to assess by an attack. This may include a loss of computer
corporate governance and the management of data protection The majority of firms identified governance as the most hardware or even instances of general liability.
and cybersecurity in regulated firms, created and implemented prevalent area for improvement and incident management
an enhanced supervisory programme for high-risk firms, updated as a top concern. Some firms highlighted areas of In its response to regulated insurance firms, the
the Regulatory Authority’s AML/CFT rules in accordance with Law weakness in terms of third-party management and the Regulatory Authority highlighted that firms should
No. 20 of 2019 on combatting money laundering and terrorism need to strengthen data loss prevention measures. manage any affirmative and non-affirmative
financing in the State of Qatar, finalised its leverage ratio framework, cyber insurance risk according to the firm’s own
and provided valuable insights on macroeconomic and finance The survey results for the banking sector indicated that risk appetite, pricing and underwriting strategy,
stability to the Regulatory Authority staff through macroprudential appropriate cyber security and resilience frameworks were and technical cyber insurance expertise.
analysis of the Qatari economy and the energy and finance sectors. largely in place across the firms, with varying degrees of
sophistication. However, the survey indicated that at some In communicating the findings of the review to
A division-wide focus on cybersecurity firms, the level of understanding of the implications of regulated firms, the Regulatory Authority stated
cyber risk at senior management levels was not sufficient. expectations that the governing bodies of each firm
Qatar was ranked the 17th safest country in the world for measures would fully recognise their responsibilities in relation
taken against cyberattacks in 2018, according to the Global The 21 regulated insurers and insurance intermediaries to information technology-related risks, governance
Cybersecurity Index published the same year by the United Nation’s identified organisational structure and resources as the and risk management. Supervisors asked firms to
International Telecommunication Union. The index also placed areas where they had the strongest capabilities. However, place remediation of any identified deficiencies
Qatar as the third most cyber-safe Arab nation in the world. Along similar to banks, insurers identified governance and among their top priorities. In particular, the Regulatory
with this impressive ranking, the Regulatory Authority continued cyber incident management as their vulnerabilities. Authority urged each firm to fully implement
to uphold the level of security by conducting a cybersecurity its proposed action plan to address deficiencies
assessment of the regulated financial firms in the QFC. Some insurers reported that they had underwritten cyber identified as part of the review as soon as possible.
risk insurance policies for clients that covered cyberattacks,
The 2019 assessment was conducted via a series of surveys as also known as “affirmative cyber risk”. Cyber risk insurance
well as on-site visits to regulated banks, insurers and investment policies currently fall under “first-party” and “third-party”
management companies. The surveys were designed to ascertain coverages. The former includes a loss of business income
firms’ preparedness for cyberattacks or cybersecurity breaches. as a direct result of an attack, while third-party pertains
The surveys focused on internal governance, delivery of change to the business and legal costs incurred, for example, the
management, and understanding of third-party risks, and failure to prevent a leak of confidential client data.
evaluated cyber defences. The survey was aligned to the ISO 27000